Comparison of right and left ventricular responses to left ventricular assist device support in patients with severe heart failure - A primary role of mechanical unloading underlying reverse remodeling

Citation
A. Barbone et al., Comparison of right and left ventricular responses to left ventricular assist device support in patients with severe heart failure - A primary role of mechanical unloading underlying reverse remodeling, CIRCULATION, 104(6), 2001, pp. 670-675
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CIRCULATION
ISSN journal
00097322 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
670 - 675
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(20010807)104:6<670:CORALV>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background-Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) reverse ventricular, myoc ardial, and systemic abnormalities characteristic of severe heart failure ( reverse remodeling). The relative contributions of hemodynamic unloading an d normalized biochemical milieu to reverse remodeling are unknown. Methods and Results-Structural and functional characteristics were measured from 53 hearts of patients undergoing transplantation without LVAD support (medical support) and 33 hearts from patients receiving a median of 46 day s of LVAD support (range, 8 to 360 days). Compared with medical support alo ne, patients receiving LVAD support for greater than or equal to 30 days ha d higher central venous pressures (11 +/-6 versus 8 +/-5 mmHg, P=0.04), low er pulmonary artery diastolic pressures (14 +/-9 versus 21 +/-9 mm Hg, P= 0 .01), and higher cardiac outputs (5.1 +/-1.6 versus 3.7 +/-1.0 L/min, P <0. 001). In LVAD versus transplantation hearts, V-30 (ex vivo volume yielding ventricular pressure of 30 min Hg was decreased in the left ventricle (LV) (179 +/- 75 versus 261 +/- 118 mL, P=0.005) but not in the right ventricle (RV) (140 +/- 59 versus 148 +/- 52 mL, P=NS). LV myocyte diameter decreased more significantly after LVAD support (17%, P= 0.05) than in the RV (11%, P=NS). Compared with transplantation, LVAD support increased normalized SER CA2a content in the LV (0.51 +/-0.26 versus 1.04 +/-0.34, P <0.001) but not in the RV (0.48 +/- 34 versus 0.67 +/-0.55, P=NS). Finally, LVAD support i mproved force-frequency relations of isolated superfused LV trabeculae (P=0 .01) but not RV trabeculae. Conclusions-Reduction of hemodynamic load is a primary factor underlying se veral important features of reverse remodeling. These findings do not precl ude a possible primary role of neurohomonal factors underlying other facets of reverse remodeling during LVAD support.