Although the occurrence of U-shaped dose responses in toxicology (i.e., hor
metic effects) have been known for more than a century, the concept of horm
esis has long been marginalized under the belief that such observations cou
ld be explained by a combination of poor study designs and normal variabili
ty. However, recent efforts have established that numerous highly reliable
studies demonstrating hormetic effects exist and that such findings appear
to be highly generalizable across species, endpoint measures, and class of
agents assessed. In light of such a long and complicated history, and its s
ignificant biomedical/toxicological implications, this article explores the
unique challenges that the concept of hormesis confronts in both the exper
imental and institutional domains with respect to assessing its scientific
foundations and validity and the impediments to its intstitutional acceptan
ce and use with society. This perspective is then immediately critiqued by
five authors in subsequent articles.