One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er : YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: A comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er : YAGlasers

Citation
Ev. Ross et al., One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er : YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: A comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er : YAGlasers, DERM SURG, 27(8), 2001, pp. 709-715
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology
Journal title
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
ISSN journal
10760512 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
709 - 715
Database
ISI
SICI code
1076-0512(200108)27:8<709:OCVME:>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background. The CO2 laser is normally described as an aggressive resurfacin g tool, whereas the erbium:YAG laser has enjoyed a reputation as the ideal tool for superficial resurfacing. The implication from many studies is that the CO2 laser is incapable of "minimally invasive" resurfacing. Objective. To compare a short-pulsed CO2 laser with an Er: YAG laser over a range of parameters intended to produce equivalent microscopic and clinica l injuries. Methods. A prospective, randomized, comparative interventional trial was co nducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Thirteen patients with facial wrinkles were enrolled in the study. A side-by-side comparison was perform ed using periorbital and perioral regions as treatment sites. One side was treated with a pulsed CO2 laser and the other with an Er-YAG laser. Postaur icular skin was treated in an identical fashion to the study sites and biop sied for microscopic analysis. The biopsies were obtained before treatment, immediately after treatment, and either 3 or 6 months after treatment to e valuate the acute level of injury and subsequent degree of fibroplasia. Pho tographs were taken at baseline, immediately after treatment, 1, 2, and 6 w eeks, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Nine physicians evaluated the pho tographs for erythemia, pigmentation, and wrinkle improvement. Results. Investigator assessment showed no statistically significant differ ences between the lasers with respect to hyperpigmentation and wrinkle redu ction. There was less erythema at the CO2 laser-treated sites 2 weeks after treatment; the differences had resolved by 6 weeks after treatment. Histol ogic examination demonstrated equivalent dermal thermal injury on immediate postoperative biopsies and equivalent fibroplasia on subsequent biopsies. Both CO2 and Er:YAG laser-treated sites showed overall modest wrinkle impro vement compared to the pretreatment photographs. Conclusion. When CO2 and Er:YAG lasers are used in a manner such that there are equivalent immediate postoperative histologic results, equivalent heal ing and cosmetic improvement occurs. One can Use CO2 laser with one pass to mimic a moderately aggressive Er:YAG laser treatment.