One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er : YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: A comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er : YAGlasers
Ev. Ross et al., One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er : YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: A comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er : YAGlasers, DERM SURG, 27(8), 2001, pp. 709-715
Background. The CO2 laser is normally described as an aggressive resurfacin
g tool, whereas the erbium:YAG laser has enjoyed a reputation as the ideal
tool for superficial resurfacing. The implication from many studies is that
the CO2 laser is incapable of "minimally invasive" resurfacing.
Objective. To compare a short-pulsed CO2 laser with an Er: YAG laser over a
range of parameters intended to produce equivalent microscopic and clinica
l injuries.
Methods. A prospective, randomized, comparative interventional trial was co
nducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Thirteen patients with facial
wrinkles were enrolled in the study. A side-by-side comparison was perform
ed using periorbital and perioral regions as treatment sites. One side was
treated with a pulsed CO2 laser and the other with an Er-YAG laser. Postaur
icular skin was treated in an identical fashion to the study sites and biop
sied for microscopic analysis. The biopsies were obtained before treatment,
immediately after treatment, and either 3 or 6 months after treatment to e
valuate the acute level of injury and subsequent degree of fibroplasia. Pho
tographs were taken at baseline, immediately after treatment, 1, 2, and 6 w
eeks, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Nine physicians evaluated the pho
tographs for erythemia, pigmentation, and wrinkle improvement.
Results. Investigator assessment showed no statistically significant differ
ences between the lasers with respect to hyperpigmentation and wrinkle redu
ction. There was less erythema at the CO2 laser-treated sites 2 weeks after
treatment; the differences had resolved by 6 weeks after treatment. Histol
ogic examination demonstrated equivalent dermal thermal injury on immediate
postoperative biopsies and equivalent fibroplasia on subsequent biopsies.
Both CO2 and Er:YAG laser-treated sites showed overall modest wrinkle impro
vement compared to the pretreatment photographs.
Conclusion. When CO2 and Er:YAG lasers are used in a manner such that there
are equivalent immediate postoperative histologic results, equivalent heal
ing and cosmetic improvement occurs. One can Use CO2 laser with one pass to
mimic a moderately aggressive Er:YAG laser treatment.