Objectives: Mitral valve combined with coronary artery surgery is associate
d with a higher hospital mortality than each operation in particular. Contr
oversy exists regarding the predictive value of ischemic mitral valve disea
se (MVD) on outcome. Methods: Between 1984 and 1997, 262 patients underwent
mitral valve operations (replacement, n = 198; repair, n = 64) in combinat
ion with coronary revascularization. The etiology of MVD was secondary to i
schemic heart disease (group I) in 82 (31%) patients, and non-ischemic (gro
up II) in 180 (69%) patients (rheumatic, 139 patients (53%); degenerative,
41 patients (16%)). Both groups were similar in age, cardiac risk factors a
nd pulmonary artery pressure. Patients of group I had significantly more se
vere coronary artery disease, more often an impaired left ventricle and myo
cardial infarction, and were in a worse functional condition. The mean numb
er of bypass grafts was significantly higher in group I. The follow-up was
98% (230/234 patients). Results: With 19.5%, the hospital mortality was sig
nificantly increased in group I compared with 6.7% in group II (P = 0.002;
overall, 10.7%). Mitral valve repair or replacement had no influence on ear
ly outcome, although mitral valve repair was performed more often in group
I (37 versus 19%). The survival (valve-related event-free survival) after d
ischarge from hospital in the 1st, 5th and loth year was 94 (94%), 70 (66%)
and 53% (35%) in group I and 96 (95%), 79 (76%) and 54% (41%) in group II,
respectively.. The long-term functional capacity was equally good in both
groups (New York Heart Association mean, 1.86 versus 1.72). Conclusions: Pa
tients with ischemic MVD are in a worse cardiac condition with significantl
y higher hospital mortality than patients with non-ischemic MVD and coronar
y artery bypass grafting. Once discharged from hospital, both groups have c
omparable long-term outcomes, with the best results in patients with degene
rative MVD. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.