I. Ben-shlomo et al., Can we abandon routine evaluation of serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction?, FERT STERIL, 76(2), 2001, pp. 300-303
Objective: To assess whether abandoning measurement of serum estradiol (E-2
) and spacing ultrasound evaluations at greater intervals had an effect on
the results of assisted reproduction technology (ART)
Design: A retrospective comparison of two consecutive periods.
Setting: Division of Assisted Reproduction Technology, Department of Obstet
rics and Gynecology, Ha'Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Patient(s): One thousand nine hundred and eighty-five controlled ovarian hy
perstimulation (COH) cycles for ART were initiated during the years 1996 to
1999.
Intervention(s): During the first 2 years an intensive follow-up protocol w
as used that included E-2 blood levels measurements. In the next 2 years a
less intensive protocol was adopted that did not use E-2 measurements.
Main Outcome Measure(s): ART results and the rate of ovarian hyperstimulati
on syndrome (OHSS).
Result(s): The patients' background characteristics did not differ between
the two periods. The cancellation rate was not different (9.8% vs. 7.2%). T
here was no difference in the duration of stimulation or the amount of gona
dotropins used. The number of oocytes retrieved (12.1 +/- 9.3, vs. 9.6 +/-
6.3), fertilization rates (74% vs. 75%), and clinical pregnancy rates (26.2
% vs. 27.9%) did not differ. The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulati
on syndrome was not significantly different between the two periods.
Conclusion(s): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for ART can be done reli
ably without routine, serial serum E-2 measurements without compromising th
e treatment results. (C) 2001 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.