This article reports three experiments that examined the effects of ph
otographic method, computerized visualization scheme, and posture comp
lexity on posture perception and specification for computer-aided ergo
nomic analysis. The subjects were presented with photographs of workin
g postures, and were required to manipulate human forms generated by a
n ergonomics software program to match the postures in the photographs
. The first experiment showed a clear advantage of using a three-dimen
sional (3-D) human form graphic with two photographs when complex, asy
mmetric postures were analysed. However, the use of a 3-D human graphi
c display and two photographs jeopardized the subjects' posture specif
ication performance when simple, symmetric pastures were analysed. The
results of the second and the third experiment demonstrated the impor
tance of achieving congruency between photographic and computer displa
y perspectives in improving posture specification performance. Implica
tions for ergonomic jab analysis and ergonomics software design are di
scussed.