Cs. Findlay et Lg. Zheng, DETERMINING CHARACTERISTIC STRESSOR SCALES FOR ECOSYSTEM MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, Journal of environmental management, 50(3), 1997, pp. 265-281
While most environmental scientists appreciate the importance of appro
priate spatial and temporal scales for environmental assessment and mo
nitoring, the issue of how to determine these scales has not (in our v
iew) been addressed in sufficient depth. Here we define the characteri
stic spatial scale for a stressor as the nearest distance from the sou
rce at which stressor values cannot be statistically distinguished fro
m those further away, while the characteristic time scale is the lengt
h of time required to detect a statistically significant decline in av
erage stressor values within the defined characteristic spatial scale
in response to reduced stressor emission at the source. We show that f
or a simple model of exponential distance-decay of average stressor va
lues away from the source, the characteristic distance d for a stress
or increases with (1) decreasing spatial signal strength, (2) decreasi
ng spatial noise, (3) increasing sample size and (4) decreasing sampli
ng resolution. By contrast, the characteristic time-scale tau increas
es with (1) decreasing sample size and (2) decreasing sampling resolut
ion. Moreover, unlike d, the relationship between tau*, signal streng
th and spatial noise is not straightforward. Consequently, neither is
the relationship between d and tau*; stressors with small characteris
tic spatial scales need not also have short characteristic time scales
. Thus, the accepted wisdom that spatial and temporal scales are posit
ively correlated need not be true in practice primarily because the ab
ility to defect statistically significant spatial or temporal change m
ay vary considerably among different levels of biological organization
. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.