J. Cameron et Tp. Ndhlovu, The comparative economics of EU 'subsidiarity': Lessons from development/regional economic debates, INT J URBAN, 25(2), 2001, pp. 327
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH
The term substantive subsidiarity' characterizes a radical position in the
major debate in the European Union (ELT) on how to structure territorially-
based power in a closely interlinked economy. A similar debate took place i
n the period between the 1950s and the early 1990s, over the need for radic
al reform of spatial economic and power structures in Canada and less devel
oped countries. The difficulty in constructing supporting arguments from ec
onomics for both these positions can be better understood by looking at the
whole range of economic thought on spatial structures. A characterization
of this range into three models reveals how economics generally supports ce
ntralizing tendencies. The assumptions required to make a case for stronger
, more local authorities in the EU, Canada or less developed economies are
shown to be restrictive. The article concludes that the case for substantiv
e subsidiarity in the EU, which calls for radical decentralization to more
local levels of government, claiming efficiency and equity gains, faces a s
imilar challenge to that faced by earlier economists writing on less develo
ped economies.