Hypotheses generated by a developmental taxonomy that distinguishes between
childhood and adolescent onset conduct disorders were tested. Hypotheses p
redicted that (1) individual and familial factors would be more strongly re
lated to childhood onset conduct disorder, whereas ethnic minority status a
nd exposure to deviant peers would be more strongly related to adolescent o
nset conduct disorder and (2) individuals with childhood onset disorder wou
ld be more likely to commit violent and victim oriented offenses than indiv
iduals with adolescent onset conduct disorder. The first hypothesis was str
ongly supported and the second hypothesis was partially supported. Implicat
ions for early identification of youth at risk for chronic offending are di
scussed.