Me. Hammadeh et al., Evaluation of cryoinjury of spermatozoa after slow (programmed biological freezer) or rapid (liquid nitrogen vapour) freeze-thawing techniques, J AS REPROD, 18(7), 2001, pp. 364-370
Purpose: This study was initiated to determine the negative effect (cryodam
age) on human spermatozoa after freeze-thawing and to find out whether free
zing of spermatozoa with a computerized biological freezer is more advantag
eous than freezing above static liquid nitrogen vapour with regard to sperm
atozoa vitality, chromatin normality, morphology, and membrane integrity. M
ethods: Forty-four semen samples were obtained front patients attending and
rology laboratory, and each sample was divided into two aliquots. One aliqu
ot was frozen using static liquid nitrogen vapour (G.II) and the second wit
h a computerized biological freezer (G.III). Acridine orange was used for a
ssessment of chromatin cryoinjury, whereas the morphology was evaluated acc
ording to WHO criteria. Hypoosmotic swelling test was used to identify rnem
brane integrity and eosin-nigrosin staining was used to determine the vital
ity, of spermatozoa. Results: The rnean percentage of normally condensed ch
romatin in the native semen sample (G.I) decreased significantly, (p<.001)
after freeze-thawing by using either liquid nitrogen vapour (G.II), or a bi
ological freezer (G.III), which was significantly higher (p <.001) after fr
eezing with liquid nitrogen vapour than after freezing with the biological
programmed freezer. Morphologically normal spermatozoa decreased significan
tly (p <.001) in both freezing methods in comparison to the native semen sa
mples. In addition, membrane integrity, of spermatozoa (HOS-test positive)
was significantly, lower (p<.001) after the freeze-thawing procedure in G.I
I and 6.III compared to G.I. In both these parameters the deterioration was
similar among the two freezing procedures. Finally, the mean percentage of
live spermatozoa decreased significantly (p<.001) in both freezing techniq
ues in relation to the mean value in the neat semen samples. Conclusions: F
reeze-thawing procedure has a detrimental effect on chromatin, morphology,
membrane integrity, and vitality of human spermatozoa not only by, freezing
above static liquid nitrogen vapour but even by using a computerized biolo
gical freezer: Howe rev; the chromatin deterioration rates are significantl
y, higher by freezing above static liquid nitrogen vapour in comparison to
freezing with a programmed biological freezer: Therefore, we recommend the
use of this technique for freeing semen especially, when ICSI technique is
considered as the main therapeutic procedure.