Acquired pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation ofparoxysmal atrial fibrillation

Citation
Wc. Yu et al., Acquired pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation ofparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, J CARD ELEC, 12(8), 2001, pp. 887-892
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
10453873 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
887 - 892
Database
ISI
SICI code
1045-3873(200108)12:8<887:APVSAR>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Introduction: Elimination of the initiating focus within the pulmonary vein (PV) using radiofrequency (PF) catheter ablation is a new treatment modali ty for treatment of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. However, informati on on the long-term safety of PF ablation within the PV is limited. Methods and Results: In 102 patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillati on and at least one initiating focus from the PV, series transesophageal ec hocardiography was performed to monitor the effect of RF ablation on the PV . There were 66 foci in the right upper PV and 65 foci in the left upper PV . Within 3 days of ablation, 26 of the ablated right upper PVs (39 %) had i ncreased peak Doppler flow velocity (mean 130 +/- 28 cm/sec, range 106 to 2 20), and 15 of the ablated left upper PVs (23%) had increased peak Doppler flow velocity (mean 140 +/- 39 cm/sec, range 105 to 219). Seven patients ha d increased peak Doppler flow velocity in both upper PVs. No factor (includ ing age, sex, site of ablation, number of RF pulses, pulse duration, and te mperature) could predict PV stenosis after RF ablation. Three patients with stenosis of both upper PVs experienced mild dyspnea on exertion, but only one had mild increase of pulmonary pressure. There was no significant chang e of peak and mean flow velocity and of PV diameter in sequential follow-up studies up to 16 (209 +/- 94 days) months. Conclusion: Focal PV stenosis is observed frequently after PF catheter abla tion applied within the vein, but usually is without clinical significance. However, ablation within multiple PVs might cause pulmonary hypertension a nd should be considered a limiting factor in this procedure.