A wide diversity of fishes possess chemical alarm signalling systems. Howev
er, it is not known whether the specific chemicals that act as alarm signal
s are conserved within most taxonomic groups. In this study we tested wheth
er cross-species responses to chemical alarm signals occurred within salmon
id fishes. In separate laboratory experiments, we exposed brook charr (Salv
elinus fontinalis), brown trout (Salmo trutta), and rainbow trout (Oncorhyn
chus mykiss) to chemical alarm signals from each of the three salmonid spec
ies and from swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri). In each case, the test speci
es responded with appropriate antipredator behavior to all three salmonids
alarm cues, but did not react to swordtail cues. These data suggest that ch
emical alarm cues are partially conserved within the Family Salmonidae. For
each species tested, the intensity of the response was stronger to conspec
ific alarm cues, than to heterospecific alarm cues, indicating that salmoni
ds could distinguish between chemical cues of conspecifics versus heterospe
cifics. These results suggest that the chemical(s) that act as the alarm cu
es may be: 1) identical and that there may be other chemical(s) that allow
the test fish to distinguish between conspecifics and heterospecifics, or 2
) that the cues that act as signals are not identical, but are similar enou
gh to be recognized.