The statistical power for detecting change in water quality should be a pri
mary consideration when designing monitoring studies. However, some of the
standard approaches for estimating sample size result in a power of less th
an 50%, and doubling the pre- and post-treatment sample size are necessary
to increase the power to 80%, The ability to detect change can be improved
by including an additional explanatory variable such as paired watershed me
asurements. However, published guidelines have not explicitly quantified th
e benefits of including an explanatory variable or the specific conditions
that favor a paired watershed design. This paper (1) presents a power analy
sis for the statistical model (analysis of covariance) commonly used in pai
red watershed studies; (2) discusses the conditions under which it is benef
icial to include an explanatory variable; and (3) quantifies the benefits o
f the paired watershed design. The results show that it is beneficial to in
clude an explanatory variable when its correlation to the water quality var
iable of concern is as low as about 0.3. The ability to detect change incre
ases nonlinearly as the correlation increases. Power curves quantify sample
size requirements as a function of the correlation and intrinsic variabili
ty. In general, the temporal and spatial variability of many watershed-scal
e characteristics, such as annual sediment loads, makes it very difficult t
o detect changes within time spans that are useful for land managers or con
ducive to adaptive management. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights re
served.