This article examines the ethical basis for government involvement in healt
h care. It first provides the case for individual autonomy, focusing on the
justifications-particularly ethical ones for allowing individuals to make
their own choices in health care, and to control more of their own resource
s in doing so. Next, it provides the opposite case for abridging individual
autonomy, and in particular, for redistributing resources from those who a
re well off to those who are not. The overriding reason for favouring the l
atter case, which trumps the notion of individual autonomy, is to ensure th
at individuals who are at a disadvantage have an equal probability of attai
ning good health.