Clinicians involved in the opioid pharmacotherapy of cancer-related pain sh
ould be acquainted with a variety of opioids and be skilled in the selectio
n of doses when the type, (of opioid or route of administration needs chang
ing. The optimal dose should avoid underdosing or overdosing, both associat
ed with negative outcomes for the patient. Although equianalgesic dose tabl
es are generally used to determine the new doses in these circumstances, th
e evidence to support the ratios indicated in these tables largely refers t
o the context of single dose administration. The applicability of these rat
ios to the setting of chronic opioid administration has been questioned. A
systematic search of published literature from 1966 to September 1999 was c
onducted to critically appraise the emerging evidence on equianalgesic dose
ratios derived from studies of chronic opioid administration. There were s
ix major findings: 1) there exists a general paucity of data related to lon
g-term dosing and studies are heterogeneous in nature; 2) the ratios exhibi
t extremely wide ranges; 3) methadone is more potent than previously apprec
iated; 4) the ratios related to methadone are highly correlated with the do
se of the previous opioid; 5) the ratio may change according to the directi
on the opioid switch; and 6) discrepancies exist with respect to both oxyco
done and fentanyl. Overall, these findings have important clinical implicat
ions for clinicians and warrant consideration in the potential revision of
current tables. The complexity of the clinical context in which many switch
es occur must be recognized and also appreciated in the design of future st
udies. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee, 2001.