Charities frequently announce contributions of donors as they accrue. Doing
so induces donors to play a sequential-move rather than simultaneous-move
game. We examine the conditions under which a charity prefers such sequenti
al play. It is known that if donors only value contributions through their
effect on the total provision of a public good, then the charity will not a
nnounce contributions sequentially. However, with more general utility func
tions that include additional effects such as warm-glow or snob appeal, the
charity may benefit from announcing contributions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scien
ce BY All rights reserved.