Internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation initiation in equine rhinitis A virus: Similarities to and differences from that of foot-and-mouthdisease virus
Tm. Hinton et al., Internal ribosomal entry site-mediated translation initiation in equine rhinitis A virus: Similarities to and differences from that of foot-and-mouthdisease virus, J VIROLOGY, 74(24), 2000, pp. 11708-11716
Equine rhinitis A virus (ERAV) has recently been classified as an aphthovir
us, a genus otherwise comprised of the different serotypes of Foot-and-mout
h disease virus (FMDV). FMDV initiates translation via a type II internal r
ibosomal entry site (IRES) and utilizes two in-frame AUG codons to produce
the leader proteinases Lab and Lb. Here we show that the ERAV 5 ' nontransl
ated region also possesses the core structures of a type II IRES. The funct
ional activity of this region was characterized by transfection of bicistro
nic plasmids into BHK-21 cells. In this system the core type Il structures,
stem-loops D to L, in addition to a stem-loop (termed M) downstream of the
first putative initiation codon, are required for translation of the secon
d reporter gene. In FMDV, translation of Lb is more efficient than that of
Lab despite the downstream location of the Lb AUG codon. The ERAV genome al
so has putative initiation sites in positions similar to those utilized in
FMDV, except that in ERAV these are present as two AUG pairs (AUGAUG). Usin
g the bicistronic expression system, we detected initiation from both AUG p
airs, although in contrast to FMDV, the first site is strongly favored over
the second. Mutational analysis of the AUG codons indicated that AUG2 is t
he major initiation site, although AUG1 can be accessed, albeit inefficient
ly, in the absence of AUG2. Further mutational analysis indicated that codo
ns downstream of AUG2 appear to be accessed by a mechanism other than leaky
scanning. Furthermore, we present preliminary evidence that it is possible
for ribosomes to access downstream of the two AUG pairs. This study reveal
s important differences in IRES function between aphthoviruses.