Aim of study: Recent investigations have indicated that adequate lithium tr
eatment lowers the suicide mortality associated with affective illness. One
important question is whether the mechanism by which lithium prophylaxis m
ay be effective in prolonging survival can be explained exclusively in term
s of successful protection against the recurrence of depressive episodes, o
r whether one should consider an independent anti-suicidal factor. Methods:
We investigated a group of high-risk patients with recurrent affective dis
orders (n = 167) who had committed one or more suicide attempts before the
start of lithium prophylaxis within a collaborative project by the Internat
ional Group for the Study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLI). According to
their recurrence-related response to long-term lithium prophylaxis, patien
ts were classified into three groups: excellent (n = 45), moderate (n = 81)
and poor responders (n = 41). Only depressive episodes resulting into hosp
italisation were considered. A marked reduction in the number of suicide at
tempts was observed in the excellent lithium responders. However, we also f
ound that over 80% of moderate responders and nearly 50% of poor responders
did not exhibit any further suicidal behaviour during lithium treatment. F
urthermore, we could demonstrate a significant reduction of suicide attempt
s per year as compared to a corresponding pre-lithium period in all three g
roups (0.10 vs. 0.33, 0.06 vs. 0.27, 0.02 vs. 0.26). There were four suicid
es in this high-risk group, corresponding to a suicide-related standardised
mortality ratio (SMR) of 13.7. This contrasts sharply with an expected sui
cide SMR of approx. 100 in this population. Suicide risk was not related to
the recurrence-preventing effect. Conclusion: The reduction in suicide att
empts, in both responders and non-responders, indicates that lithium posses
ses a specific anti-suicidal effect besides its mood-stabilising property.