Much of the focus on the geography of poverty relates to 'people poverty',
the geography of private income, or income proxy measures. In contrast to a
sole emphasis on the geography of people poverty, this article broadens th
e debate to include the relatively neglected aspect of place poverty. It di
scusses the conceptual differences between people poverty and place poverty
, and then provides an illustration of the differences between their geogra
phical distribution in England. The results of this primary analysis sugges
t that the geography of people and place poverty appear to be quite differe
nt.