Improving adherence to antidepressant drug treatment in primary care: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial of educational intervention

Citation
A. Atherton-naji et al., Improving adherence to antidepressant drug treatment in primary care: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial of educational intervention, PRIM CARE P, 7(2), 2001, pp. 61-67
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
PRIMARY CARE PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
13552570 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
61 - 67
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-2570(200106)7:2<61:IATADT>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Poor adherence to prescribed medication is a well-documented waste of resou rces and may be particularly prevalent in depressive illness. Studies in pr imary care have suggested rates of non-adherence to antidepressants of 50-7 0%. We undertook a feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial of a novel intervention. Patents prescribed antidepressants in primary care were randomly allocated to receive a computer-generated educational interventio n or to routine practice. Patients in the intervention groups received simp le tailored information 1, 6 and 16 weeks after the initial prescription, w hich was personalized for each patient and specific drug and generated by a specially constructed computer programme. Comparisons were made in terms o f collection of prescriptions over 6 months, mental health status (the Hosp ital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)), frequencies of consultation, ref errals and admissions and satisfaction with treatment. The five participati ng practices referred 61 patents to the study over 12 months, 45 of whom en tered and completed the study. There were no statistically significant diff erences between the groups in the proportions of patients who collected pre scriptions over 6 months, with the overall rates declining from 91% in mont h 1 to 56% in month 6. Patients in the intervention group had significantly lower HADS scores at 6 months. There were no significant differences in th e numbers of consultations, referrals and admissions. Thus, whilst there we re indications that the intervention might yield benefits for patients, the study was of insufficient statistical power to yield unequivocal results. The difficulties of recruiting patients in primary care are discussed and o ptions for further research considered.