Reputation and the legibility of doctors' handwriting in situ

Citation
Ga. Cheeseman et N. Boon, Reputation and the legibility of doctors' handwriting in situ, SCOT MED J, 46(3), 2001, pp. 79-80
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00369330 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
79 - 80
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-9330(200106)46:3<79:RATLOD>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The consequences of failed communication can be as disastrous and doctors h ave a reputation for illegibility. Previous research supports this opinion but little work, has been done to assess doctors' legibility in situ. Our s tudy evaluates if doctors deserve their reputation and investigates holt, l egibility is affected by the time taken to write. Sets of in-patient hospit al notes were selected at random. The first written entry by a doctor and a nurse in the current admission were analysed. In addition to this, 10 doct ors and 10 nurses, unaware of the trite nature of the study, wrote out list s of words and the time taken to do the task was recorded. The doctors' han dwriting was significantly less legible (p=0.010) and they wrote significan tly quicker (p=0.005). However a small minority of the doctors was responsi ble for the majority of illegible words written by that group.