Study Design. Endoscopic spinal procedures were performed under computed-to
mography-based, image-guided assistance.
Objective. To assess the clinical feasibility of applying a methodology tha
t allows image-guided assistance in endoscopic spinal surgery.
Summary of Background Data. Endoscopic spinal procedures have become a part
of the minimal invasive approaches to the spine. The main disadvantage of
these techniques is the long learning curve and the lack of peroperative mo
nitoring. Fluoroscopy does have disadvantages, such as positioning during s
urgery and the risk for radiation exposure. Fluoroscopy-based navigation ha
s many advantages, however it is still based on preselected fluoroscopic im
ages. There is no method that allows computed-tomography-based navigation i
n endoscopic conditions.
Methods. Two patients have been operated on using endoscopic approaches ass
isted by computed-tomography-based navigational system. One had a thoracosc
opic approach for median calcified disc herniation and another one had an e
ndoscopic posterior approach for resection of a sacro-iliac osteophyte. For
each patient, a frame of reference had been placed percutaneously and scan
ned. The computed tomography images were registered to the anatomy using th
e geometry of the frame as fiducials. Navigation through endoscopic approac
hes was possible in both cases.
Results. In both cases navigation was reliable and a helpful monitoring to
achieve the surgical goals through endoscopic approaches.
Conclusions. There are some factors that make endoscopic spine surgery a di
fficult start. Image-guided spine surgery is technically feasible and clini
cally applicable in endoscopic approaches.