J. Nakajima et al., Thoracoscopic surgery and conventional open thoracotomy in metastatic lungcancer - A comparative clinical analysis of surgical outcomes, SURG ENDOSC, 15(8), 2001, pp. 849-853
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Background: We performed a retrospective comparison of the oncological outc
ome of thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary metastasis with that of conventi
onal open thoracotomy.
Methods: The patient population for our retrospective comparison was compri
sed of 45 patients undergoing pulmonary resections via video-assisted thora
coscopy (thoracoscopy group) and 55 undergoing similar resections by open t
horacotomy (open group) for pulmonary metastases between 1994 and 1999.
Results: Solitary metastasis was resected more frequently with thoracoscopy
than open thoracotomy. There were no significant intergroup differences in
rates of local recurrence from the initial pulmonary resection site. The a
ctuarial 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were, respectively, 82.8
%, 70.0%, and 62.3% in the thoracoscopy group and 93.6%, 64.6%, and 52.7% i
n the open group. The rates of pulmonary recurrence and survival also did n
ot differ significantly between the two groups with solitary metastases.
Conclusion: Thoracoscopic surgery for metastatic lung disease appears to be
feasible as long as the preoperative metastatic tumor evaluation using che
st computed tomography (CT) is accurate.