Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) ultras
ound system in volume estimation of cervical carcinoma Study design. T
ransvaginal 3D and two-dimensional (2D) scans on cervical carcinoma vo
lumes were performed 1 day before surgery. The volume of cervical carc
inoma measured from each surgical specimen was compared with the corre
sponding volume of the cervical tumor measured by a 3D ultrasound and
with the conventional 2D ultrasound volume measurement calculated usin
g the formula pi/6 x (R-1 x R-2 x R-3), where R-1, R-2, and R-3 were t
he maximal transverse, anteroposterior, and longitudinal length of tum
or, respectively. Limits of agreement and 95% confidence intervals wer
e calculated and systemic bias between the methods was analyzed. The K
lotz test was also used to assess the statistical significance of the
degree of dispersion, Results. A total of 61 cases, 55 with exophytic
tumors and 6 with endocervical tumors, were examined in this study. Th
e limits of agreement between the volume measured from specimen and tu
mor volume determined by ultrasound were +6.68 to -6.10 mL for 3D meas
urements and +12.46 to -10.98 mL for 2D measurements. The Klotz test s
howed the discrepancy in the degree of dispersion between 3D and 2D ul
trasound measurements was statistically significant (P = 0.01). Conclu
sion. The true volume of cervical carcinoma is measured more accuratel
y by a 3D ultrasound system than 2D ultrasound. (C) 1997 Academic Pres
s.