Mo. Tan et al., Combination of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and ondansetronin preventing cisplatin-induced emesis, UROL INTERN, 67(1), 2001, pp. 54-58
Objective: To find out whether the combination of transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulation (TENS) and ondansetron had an increased antiemetic effec
t. Materials and Methods: Fourteen testis and 11 bladder cancer patients we
re scheduled for 4 cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin (BEP) or methotr
exate-vinblastine-etoposide-cisplatin (MVEC) combination chemotherapy, resp
ectively. At each cycle the whole cisplatin dose was given in 1 day that is
100 mg/m(2)/day in the BEP and 70 mg/m(2)/day in the MVEC protocols. Ondan
setron was given at a dose of 12 mg/day and TENS was applied by commerciall
y available 'Relief Band'(Maven Labs, Inc., Citrus Heights, Calif., USA). T
he first 3 cycles of each case were blindly randomized to one of the follow
ing regimens; TENS vs. ondansetron vs. a combination of both. The regimens
were applied during the administration of cisplatin and the patients were a
sked to report their nausea according to a scale between 0 to 10. Also for
each regimen the number of emetic attacks experienced during the administra
tion of cisplatin was recorded by the same observer. Then the scores of eac
h regimen were compared. Results: The mean nausea scores for regimens TENS,
ondansetron and TENS + ondansetron were found to be 5.12 +/- 2.54, 3.0 +/-
1.71 and 0.8 +/- 0.96, respectively. Ondansetron was better than TENS in p
reventing nausea (p = 0.000). However the combination of TENS and ondansetr
on resulted in a significant decrease in nausea scores when compared to TEN
S alone (p = 0.000) or ondansetron alone (p = 0.000). The mean number of em
etic attacks for the TENS, ondansetron and TENS + ondansetron regimens were
3.16 +/- 1.84, 1.64 +/- 1.44 and 0.56 +/- 0.82, respectively. A statistica
lly significant difference was present between the number of emetic attacks
observed with the TENS + ondansetron combination and TENS alone (p = 0.000
) or ondansetron alone (p = 0.001). Ondansetron was again better than TENS
in preventing emetic attacks (p = 0.001). Conclusion:The use of TENS as an
adjunct to ondansetron therapy has provided significant benefit in preventi
ng nausea and emetic attacks caused by cisplatin. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Kar
ger AG, Basel.