Intermittent androgen deprivation: Update of cycling characteristics in patients without clinically apparent metastatic prostate cancer

Citation
Gd. Grossfeld et al., Intermittent androgen deprivation: Update of cycling characteristics in patients without clinically apparent metastatic prostate cancer, UROLOGY, 58(2), 2001, pp. 240-245
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00904295 → ACNP
Volume
58
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
240 - 245
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-4295(200108)58:2<240:IADUOC>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objectives. To update the cycling characteristics and patterns of treatment in patients receiving intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) for clinical ly localized and recurrent prostate cancer. Methods. We report our experience with 61 patients treated with IAD. Thirty -four patients had received no prior treatment, and 27 had developed recurr ent disease after previous local therapy. No patient had clinically apparen t metastatic disease before the initiation of therapy. The mean and median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before treatment was 25.3 ng/mL and 16.0 ng/mL, respectively (range 0.5 to 190 ng/mL). For each cycle, and rogen deprivation was continued until PSA became undetectable or a nadir le vel was reached. Patients were then observed without treatment, and therapy was reinstituted after the serum PSA value reached a predetermined level. Patients were no longer eligible to cycle off treatment when their serum PS A increased despite ongoing androgen deprivation or if any objective eviden ce of disease progression was present on imaging studies. Results. Follow-up ranged from 7 to 60 months (mean 30) from the start of t reatment. Patients received from one to five treatment cycles (median two), with a median cycle length of 14 months. The median nadir serum PSA level during androgen deprivation was 0.01 ng/mL and was reached within an averag e of 6 months (range 4 to 9) after beginning treatment. Patients spent an a verage of 45% of the time not receiving therapy, but the time off therapy d ecreased as the number of treatment cycles increased. Five patients (8.1%) demonstrated progressive disease, with a median time to progression of 48 m onths. When examining the cycling characteristics of these patients, no con sistent pattern of failure emerged. Conclusions. IAD appears to be a viable treatment option in select patients with localized prostate cancer. With each consecutive cycle, the amount of time the patient was not receiving therapy decreased, despite achieving a low nadir PSA. Longer follow-up with more patients failing IAD will be requ ired before clear patterns of failure emerge in these patients. UROLOGY 58: 240-245, 2001. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.