CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) versus CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II lymph-node positive breast cancer - A phase III randomized multicenter study
Ig. Ron et al., CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) versus CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II lymph-node positive breast cancer - A phase III randomized multicenter study, AM J CL ONC, 24(4), 2001, pp. 323-327
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
A multicenter phase III randomized study compared the efficacies of two adj
uvant polychemotherapeutic regimens in 145 patients with stage H node-posit
ive breast cancer. The standard chemotherapy combination, CMF (cyclophospha
mide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil), was administered to 77 women. The expe
rimental protocol, CNF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, 5-FU), in which mit
oxantrone (Novantrone) replaced methotrexate, was given to 68 patients. Fol
low-up of the 145 patients by six participating hospitals showed no statist
ically significant difference (p = 0.6) between the two treatment regimens
during a median follow-up of 4.5 years in terms of overall survival. There
was, however, a significant advantage (p = 0.04) in the disease-free surviv
al for those receiving mitoxantrone (mean survival 4.4 years for CNF versus
2.7 years for CMF). Toxic side effects associated with CNF (particularly a
lopecia and myelotoxicity) were relatively more frequent but acceptable and
did not lead to dose reduction. In light of its association with improved
disease-free survival in this study, larger studies should be undertaken on
the role of mitoxantrone as adjuvant treatment in stage Il breast cancer.