An ambivalent alliance - Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality

Citation
P. Glick et St. Fiske, An ambivalent alliance - Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality, AM PSYCHOL, 56(2), 2001, pp. 109-118
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST
ISSN journal
0003066X → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
109 - 118
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-066X(200102)56:2<109:AAA-HA>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The equation of prejudice with antipathy is challenged by recent research o n sexism. Benevolent sexism (a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology that offers protection and affection to women who embrace conventional role s) coexists with hostile sexism (antipathy toward women who are viewed as u surping men's power). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, first validated in U .S. samples, has been administered to over 15,000 men and women in 19 natio ns. Hostile and benevolent sexism are complementary, cross-culturally preva lent ideologies, both of which predict gender inequality. Women, as compare d with men, consistently reject hostile sexism but often endorse benevolent sexism (especially in the most sexist cultures). By rewarding women for co nforming to a patriarchal status quo, benevolent sexism inhibits gender equ ality. More generally, affect toward minority groups is often ambivalent, b ut subjectively positive stereotypes are not necessarily benign.