P. Glick et St. Fiske, An ambivalent alliance - Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality, AM PSYCHOL, 56(2), 2001, pp. 109-118
The equation of prejudice with antipathy is challenged by recent research o
n sexism. Benevolent sexism (a subjectively favorable, chivalrous ideology
that offers protection and affection to women who embrace conventional role
s) coexists with hostile sexism (antipathy toward women who are viewed as u
surping men's power). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, first validated in U
.S. samples, has been administered to over 15,000 men and women in 19 natio
ns. Hostile and benevolent sexism are complementary, cross-culturally preva
lent ideologies, both of which predict gender inequality. Women, as compare
d with men, consistently reject hostile sexism but often endorse benevolent
sexism (especially in the most sexist cultures). By rewarding women for co
nforming to a patriarchal status quo, benevolent sexism inhibits gender equ
ality. More generally, affect toward minority groups is often ambivalent, b
ut subjectively positive stereotypes are not necessarily benign.