The ongoing transition to managed health care continues to have repercussio
ns for health care providers, perhaps the most important of which is an emp
hasis on accountability for demonstrating the usefulness of clinical interv
entions. This requirement places a premium on intervention research and hig
hlights the historically strained relationship between psychological resear
ch and professional practice. In the midst of this challenge, researchers h
ave increasingly criticized the logic and practice of traditional null hypo
thesis significance testing. This article describes the history, epistemolo
gy, and advantages of single-participant research designs for behavioral sc
ientists and professionals in clinical settings. Although its lack of corre
spondence with the Fisherian tradition has precluded widespread adoption, t
he single-participant alternative features a design power and flexibility w
ell suite to both basic science and applied research.