This article summarizes evidence and issues associated with psychological a
ssessment. Data from more than 125 meta-analyses on test validity and 800 s
amples examining multimethod assessment suggest 4 general conclusions: (a)
Psychological test validity is strong and compelling, (b) psychological tes
t validity is comparable to medical test validity, (c) distinct assessment
methods provide unique sources of information, and (d) clinicians who rely
exclusively on interviews are prone to incomplete understandings. Following
principles for optimal nomothetic research, the authors suggest that a mul
timethod assessment battery provides a structured means for skilled clinici
ans to maximize the validity of individualized assessments. Future investig
ations should move beyond an examination of test scales to focus more on th
e role of psychologists who use tests as helpful tools to furnish patients
and referral sources with professional consultation.