Background: Some small controlled studies have found that dawn simulation i
s effective in treating seasonal affective disorder (SAD). With a larger sa
mple size and a longer duration of treatment, we compared dawn simulation w
ith bright light therapy and a placebo condition in patients with SAD.
Method: Medication-free patients with SAD were randomly assigned to one of
three conditions: bright light therapy (10,000 lux for 30 min, from 6:00 Am
to 6:30 AM), dawn simulation (1.5 hour dawn signal from 4:30 AM to 6:00 AM
peaking at 250 lux), and a placebo condition, a dim red light (1.5 hour da
wn signal from 4:30 AM to 6:00 AM peaking at 0.5 lux.) Over the subsequent
6 weeks, the subjects were blindly rated by a psychiatrist using the Struct
ured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating-Seasonal Affective
Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD). We modeled the profiles of the remissions (SIG
H-SAD less than or equal to 8) and response ( greater than or equal to 50%
decrease in SIGH-SAD) to treatment over time using Cox proportional hazards
models.
Results: The sample consisted of 95 subjects who were randomized to the thr
ee conditions: bright light (n = 33), dawn simulation (n = 31) and placebo
(n = 31). Dawn simulation was associated with greater remission (p < .05) a
nd response (p < .001) rates compared to the placebo. Bright light did not
differ significantly from the placebo. Dawn simulation was associated with
greater remission (p < .01) and response (p < .001) rates compared to the b
right light therapy. The mean daily hours of sunshine during the week befor
e each visit were associated with a significant increase in likelihood of b
oth remission (p < .001) and response (p < .001).
Conclusions: Dawn simulation was associated with greater remission and resp
onse rates compared to the placebo and compared to bright light therapy. Th
e hours of sunshine during the week before each assessment were associated
with a positive clinical response. (C) 2001 Society of Biological Psychiatr
y.