Influence of the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) in comparison to dicyandiamide (DCD) on nitrous oxide emissions, carbon dioxide fluxes and methane oxidation during 3 years of repeated application in field experiments

Citation
A. Weiske et al., Influence of the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) in comparison to dicyandiamide (DCD) on nitrous oxide emissions, carbon dioxide fluxes and methane oxidation during 3 years of repeated application in field experiments, BIOL FERT S, 34(2), 2001, pp. 109-117
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
ISSN journal
01782762 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
109 - 117
Database
ISI
SICI code
0178-2762(200108)34:2<109:IOTNI3>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
In a 3-year field experiment, the effect of the nitrification inhibitor (NI ) 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) on the release of N2O, CO2 and on C H4 oxidation, was examined in comparison to that of dicyandiamide (DCD) on N-fertilized and unfertilized experimental sites. Soil samples were analyse d simultaneously for the concentrations of N2O retained in the soil body. N H4+, NO2-, NO3-, and for the degradation kinetics of DMPP as well as DCD. D MPP decreased the release of N2O on fertilized plots by 41% (1997), 47% (19 98) and 53% (1999) (on average by 49%) while DCD reduced N2O emissions by 3 0% (1997) 22% (1998) and 29% (1999) (on average by 26%). In addition, the N Is seemed to decrease the CO2 emissions of each fertilized treatment. DCD r educed the release of CO2 by an average of 7% for the 3 years (non-fertiliz ed 10%), and DMPP reduced it by an average of up to 28% (non-fertilized 29% ). Furthermore, both NIs failed to affect CH4 oxidation negatively. The plo ts that received either DCD or DMPP even seemed to function as enhanced sin ks for atmospheric CH4. DMPP apparently stimulated CH4 oxidation of N-ferti lized plots by ca 28% in comparison to the control. In total, DCD and DMPP reduced the global warming potential of N-fertilized plots by 7% and 30%, r espectively. Further, DCD and DMPP diminished the amount of N2O retained in the soil by 52% and 61%, respectively. The concentrations of NH4+ remained unaffected by both NIs, whereas the amounts of NO2- diminished in the plot s treated with DCD by 25% and with DMPP by 20%. In both NI treatments NO3- concentrations in the soil were 23% lower than in the control. DMPP and DCD did not affect the yields of summer barley, maize and winter wheat signifi cantly. DCD was mineralized more rapidly than DMPP.