S. Overgaard et al., RESORPTION OF HYDROXYAPATITE AND FLUORAPATITE COATINGS IN MAN - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN TRABECULAR BONE, Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 79B(4), 1997, pp. 654-659
The clinical use of hydroxyapatite (HA) coating is controversial espec
ially in regard to the long-term performance of the coating and the ef
fects of resorption. In each of 15 consenting patients we inserted two
implants, coated with either HA or fluorapatite (FA) into the iliac c
rest, They were harvested at a mean of 13.6 +/- 0.6 months after surge
ry. Histological examination showed that bone ongrowth on the HA-coate
d implants was significantly greater (29%) than that on the FA-coated
implants, When bone was present on the coating surface the HA coating
was significantly thicker than the FA coating, when bone marrow was pr
esent, the HA coating was significantly thinner than the FA coating, T
he reduction in coating thickness when covered by bone or bone marrow
was 23.1 +/- 9.7 mu m for HA and 5.1 +/- 1.7 mu m for FA (p < 0.01) su
ggesting that FA is more stable than HA against resorption by bone mar
row. The findings suggest that in man the osteoconductive properties o
f HA coating are superior to those of FA. Resorption rates for both co
atings were approximately 20% of the coating thickness per year, Bone
ongrowth appears to protect against resorption whereas bone marrow see
ms to accelerate resorption, No adverse reaction was seen in the surro
unding bone.