Aims The objective of this study was to compare the effects of high doses o
f ebastine with terfenadine and placebo on QTc.
Methods Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to four treatments (ebas
tine 60 mg day(-1), ebastine 100 mg day(-1), terfenadine 360 mg day(-1), pl
acebo) administered for 7 days. Serial ECGs were performed at baseline and
day 7 of each period. QT interval was analysed using both Bazett (QTcB) and
Fridericia (QTcF) corrections.
Results Ebastine 60 mg (+ 3.7 ms) did not cause a statistically significant
change in QTcB compared with placebo (+ 1.4 ms). The mean QTcB for ebastin
e 100 mg was increased by + 10.3 ms which was significantly greater than pl
acebo but was significantly less (P < 0.05) than with terfenadine 360 mg ( 18.0 ms). There were no statistically significant differences in QTcF betw
een ebastine 60 mg (-3.2 ms) or ebastine 100 mg (1.5 ms) and placebo (-2.1
ms); although terfenadine caused a 14.1 ms increase which was significantly
different from the other three treatments. The increase in QTcB with ebast
ine most likely resulted from overcorrection of the small drug-induced incr
ease in heart rate.
Conclusions Ebastine at doses up to five times the recommended therapeutic
dose did not cause clinically relevant changes in QTc interval.