This essay exploring the nature of scientific communication begins with the
premise that conceptual innovation is both a fundamental scientific activi
ty and essentially a communication phenomenon. Conceptual innovation is fun
damental as a scientific practice in that science as an institution is pred
icated on the development of new knowledge. It is essentially communicative
in that it is the public character of science that relies on the consensua
l and communal evaluation of knowledge claims that determines the fate of n
eu, ideas. Science comprises a number of overlapping discursive formations
whose nature is determined by the positions of (and relationships among) ac
tors and ideas within communication and ideational networks, and which art,
characterized by a particular situational logic. The nature of these situa
tional logics is such as to give rise to some of the characteristic communi
cation dynamics of science, including consensus, problemshift, branching, a
nd demarcation.