Y chromosome microdeletions represent the most frequent genetic alteration
in azoospermic and severely oligozoospermic men, and screening for microdel
etions in AZFa, b and c are routinely performed in the major andrology and
infertility centres. Since patients with Y microdeletions often require int
racytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the question of whether the type of t
he microdeletion present could have prognostic value for the presence of sp
ermatozoa in the ejaculate or in the testes [by testicular sperm extraction
(TESE)] is an interesting one. The review of the literature on this topic
showed that there is still no clear genotype-phenotype relationship, i.e. s
imilar testicular alterations may be caused by different types of microdele
tions, and apparently identical microdeletions may be associated with diver
se tubular damage. Even in azoospermic men, the localization of the microde
letion cannot be used as a valid prognostic parameter before TESE-ICSI to i
dentify patients with spermatozoa in their testes. The only finding with ab
solute negative prognostic value is the presence of complete AZFa-c deletio
ns, which are invariably associated with an absence of spermatozoa. Microde
letions in AZFa or AZFb seem to have promising prognostic value, but more d
ata and gene-specific deletions have to be provided to draw clear conclusio
ns. The absence of a clear genotype-phenotype relationship, and therefore o
f a prognostic value of Y deletion analysis, is probably due to the current
methods used for the screening of the microdeletions. In fact, to date mos
t centres do not use gene-specific markers but instead use anonymous primer
s that contribute little information to the pathogenic role of the microdel
etions.