Purpose: To evaluate and compare levels of patient discomfort and complicat
ions during phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable intraocular
lens (IOL) under topical lidocaine hydrochloride in patients with and with
out various forms of chronic open-angle and chronic angle-closure glaucoma.
Setting: Two university eye centers In Germany.
Methods: This prospective nonrandomized comparative study comprised 176 eye
s of 176 patients with various forms of chronic open-angle glaucoma and chr
onic angle-closure glaucoma. Eyes with cataract and without a glaucoma diag
nosis or history of intraocular surgery served as a control group (n = 212)
. All patients received a minimum of 5 doses (2 drops per dose) of topical
lidocaine-hydrochloride 2% before standard temporal clear corneal phacoemul
sification and foldable IOL Implantation. No Intracameral anesthetic inject
ion was given, and no systemic sedatives were used. The main outcome measur
es were the number of complications and adverse events.
Results. The intraoperative complication rate in all patients (n = 388) was
capsule tear, 1.3%; zonule tear, 1.8%; vitreous loss, 1.0%; Iris prolapse,
0.8%. No statistically significant differences in intraoperative or early
postoperative complications were found between the glaucoma and control gro
ups. The mean pain scores of patients were 0.38 +/- 1.1 (SD) in the glaucom
a group and 0.36 +/- 0.8 in the control group (P = .21) Patient preference
for cataract surgery under topical anesthesia was similar in both groups.
Conclusions. Surgery-related complications and patient discomfort, were sim
ilar in patients with and without glaucoma who had phacoemulsification and
IOL implantation under topical anesthesia. These results indicate that topi
cal anesthesia is safe for routine phacoemulsification with foldable IOL im
plantation in patients with glaucoma and does not compromise patient comfor
t. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1207-1213 (C) 2001 ASCPS and ESCRS.