Purpose: To assess the efficacy of myopic and hyperopic laser in situ kerat
omileusis (LASIK retreatment procedures,
Setting: Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Methods: Retreatment was defined as either lifting the previously created f
lap or when this was not possible, cutting a new flap. Fifty-six patients w
ere retreated, 17 with hyperopia (Group 1) and 39 with myopia (Group 2). Th
e mean preoperative spherical equivalent in Group 1 was +3.79 diopters (D)
+/- 1.53 (SD) (range +1.75 to +812 D) and in Group 2, - 5.46 +/- 2.87 D (ra
nge - 0.38 to - 15.25 D).
Results: The indications for retreatment were undercorrection, decentration
, epithelial ingrowth, and central island. Postoperatively, the mean spheri
cal equivalents in Groups 1 and 2 were +1.11 +/- 2.02 D (range -1.75 to +5.
50 D) and -1.02 +/- 2.20 D (range +4.75 to -9.00 D), respectively. In Group
1, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/12 or better in 5.8% preoper
atively and in 35% postoperatively. In Group 2, the UCVA was 6/12 or better
in 5.1% preoperatively and in 59.0% postoperatively, Although 29% of the h
yperopic eyes and 8% of the myopic eyes lost 1 Snellen line of best correct
ed visual acuity (BCVA), there was an improvement (of 1 or more lines) in B
CVA in 12% and 49%, respectively. In cases that were decentered preoperativ
ely, the postoperative optical zone ablation centration was better in 85.7%
of Group 1 eyes and 61.5% of Group 2 eyes. Corneal complications following
retreatment included peripheral scarring, epithelial ingrowth, Bowman's fo
lds, and keratectasia.
Conclusions: Both myopic and hyperopic retreatments resulted in a stable re
fractive outcome. Myopic retreatments were superior to hyperopic retreatmen
ts in both efficacy and safety, J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27.-1278-1287
0 (C) 2001 ASCRS and ESCRS.