Total ozone determinations from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration operational solar backscattered ultraviolet 2 instrument observations: An update
Wg. Planet et al., Total ozone determinations from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration operational solar backscattered ultraviolet 2 instrument observations: An update, J GEO RES-A, 106(D15), 2001, pp. 17471-17478
Total ozone amounts have been derived from observations of the Solar Backsc
attered Ultraviolet 2 (SBUV/2) instruments on National Oceanic and Atmosphe
ric Administration (NOAA) operational satellites since 1985. The data from
the NOAA-9 instrument for the period 1985-1997 have been reprocessed using
instrument characterizations based on in-orbit operation and comparisons wi
th Shuttle Solar Backscattered Ultraviolet (SSBUV) observations. The data f
rom the NOAA-11 satellite for the period 1989-1994 have also been reprocess
ed using mainly internal spacecraft information. The data from the NOAA-14
satellite for the period 1995-1998 have been reprocessed using complete ins
trument characterization. The NOAA-11 and NOAA-14 data for 1998 to the pres
ent, briefly discussed herein, are preliminary. The calibration adjustments
used in the reprocessing of NOAA-9, NOAA-11, and NOAA-14 total ozone data
are internal, with the exception of those derived from SSBUV analysis, and
are independent of Dobson and Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) total
ozone measurements. The reprocessed data have been validated with ground-b
ased Dobson spectrophotometer observations, and are compared to other sourc
es of total column ozone amounts. The mean bias between NOAA-9 data and Dob
son data is 1.9% +/- 0.6% over the 12-year record with a trend of 0.1% per
year. The mean bias between NOAA-11 and Dobson data is 0.8% +/- 0.2% with a
near-zero trend. The mean bias between NOAA-14 and Dobson data is 1.5% +/-
0.3% with a trend of 0.2% per year; the NOAA-14 calibration and characteri
zation data for the period 1998 to the present are not yet fully analyzed.
The methods used in the validations are discussed here, as are some reasons
for the results. Finally, a recommendation is made for the use of a relati
vely continuous total ozone data set.