Small-scale (less than;15 km) precipitation variability significantly affec
ts the hydrologic response of a basin and the accurate estimation of water
and energy fluxes through coupled land-atmosphere modeling schemes. It also
affects the radiative transfer through precipitating clouds and thus rainf
all estimation from microwave sensors. Because both land-atmosphere and clo
ud-radiation interactions are nonlinear and occur over a broad range of sca
les (from a few centimeters to several kilometers), it is important that, o
ver these scales, cloud-resolving numerical models realistically reproduce
the observed precipitation variability. This issue is examined herein by us
ing a suite of multiscale statistical methods to compare the scale dependen
ce of precipitation variability of a numerically simulated convective storm
with that observed by radar. In particular, Fourier spectrum, structure fu
nction, and moment-scale analyses are used to show that, although the varia
bility of modeled precipitation agrees with that observed for scales larger
than approximately 5 times the model resolution, the model shows a falloff
in variability at smaller scales. Thus, depending upon the smallest scale
at which variability is considered to be important for a specific applicati
on, one has to resort either to very high resolution model runs (resolution
s 5 times higher than the scale of interest) or to stochastic methods that
can introduce the missing small-scale variability. The latter involve upsca
ling the model output to a scale approximately 5 times the model resolution
and then stochastically downscaling it to smaller scales. The results of m
ultiscale analyses, such as those presented herein, are key to the implemen
tation of such stochastic downscaling methodologies.