The simplicity of the internal normalization made it a very attractive meth
od. Yet, because of its restrictive applicability requirements, internal no
rmalization is not widely implemented in HPLC quantitative analysis. Basica
lly, applicability requirements are that all the solutes must not only be e
luted and detected but must also present similar behavior toward the detect
ion system. Ideally, response factors should be identical for all the solut
es or, in practice, of the same order of magnitude. The methodology develop
ed to validate, in a rigorous way, internal normalization was based on the
use of a statistical tool called analysis of covariance (ANACOVA). ANACOVA
is more or less similar to ANOVA but can manage a continuous variable, like
for example, concentration. So, it is possible to use it to compare calibr
ation curves of all the different solutes present in a sample, for example,
the main product and its impurity. After having checked that for the main
product the response factor was the same around the target concentration of
the HPLC method, and at low concentration, it was then possible to make co
mparison with impurity behavior, and to determine whether the use of the re
sponse factor was necessary or not. Eventually, ANACOVA enabled the validat
ion of internal normalization by assessing that all the solutes presented r
equired behavior. This methodology was successfully applied to an actual ex
ample of liquid chromatography quantitative analysis, taken from the pharma
ceutical industry. In this case, internal normalization for impurity assays
of an anticytomegalovirus drug substance was validated after response fact
or correction.