A RANDOMIZED CROSS-OVER STUDY OF HIGH-DOSE METOCLOPRAMIDE PLUS DEXAMETHASONE VERSUS GRANISETRON PLUS DEXAMETHASONE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY WITH HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN

Citation
H. Ohmatsu et al., A RANDOMIZED CROSS-OVER STUDY OF HIGH-DOSE METOCLOPRAMIDE PLUS DEXAMETHASONE VERSUS GRANISETRON PLUS DEXAMETHASONE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY WITH HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN, Japanese journal of cancer research, 85(11), 1994, pp. 1151-1158
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
09105050
Volume
85
Issue
11
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1151 - 1158
Database
ISI
SICI code
0910-5050(1994)85:11<1151:ARCSOH>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
We carried out a randomized, single-blind, cross-over trial to compare the antiemetic effect, for both acute and delayed emesis, of graniset ron plus dexamethasone (GRN+Dx) with that of high-dose metoclopramide pins dexamethasone (HDMP+Dx). Fifty-four patients with primary or meta static lung cancer, given single-dose cisplatin (> 80 mg/m(2)) chemoth erapy more than twice, were enrolled in this study. They were treated with both HDMP+Dx and GRN+Dx in two consecutive chemotherapy courses. On day 1, patients experienced a mean of 2.5 (SD=4.3) and 0.1 (SD=0.4) episodes of vomiting in the HDMP+Dx and the GRN+Dx groups, respective ly (P=0.0008). Complete response rate on day 1 was 45 and 90% in the H DMP+Dx and the GRN+Dx groups, respectively (P=0.0001). Patients treate d with GRN+Dx had a tendency to suffer more episodes of vomiting than the HDMP+Dx group on days 2-5, but it was not statistically significan t. Twenty-four patients (57%) preferred the GRN+Dx treatment and 3.4 p atients (33%), HDMP+Dx. In the HDMP+Dx group, nine patients (21%) had an extrapyramidal reaction, and 5 patients (12%) had constipation that lasted for at least two days. In contrast, no patients had extrapyram idal reactions, and 18 patients (43%) had constipation in the GRN+Dx g roup (P < 0.01). GRN+Dx was more effective than HDMP+Dx only in preven ting the acute emesis induced by cisplatin. An effective treatment for delayed emesis is still needed.