Bl. Erstad et Ke. Mcintyre, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF AMPICILLIN SULBACTAM AND CEFOXITIN FOR DIABETIC FOOT INFECTIONS/, Vascular surgery, 31(4), 1997, pp. 419-425
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind investigatio
n was to compare two different parenteral antibiotics (ampicillin/sulb
actam and cefoxitin) in conjunction with appropriate surgical procedur
es for treatment of patients with diabetic foot infections on a vascul
ar surgery service. Thirty-six patients with diabetes mellitus who req
uired hospitalization to treat foot infections were randomized into on
e of two treatment groups. There were 18 patients with similar baselin
e characteristics randomized to each treatment group. The Chi-square t
est was used for clinical and bacteriological comparisons, the Wilcoxo
n rank sum test was used for comparing duration of hospitalization and
clinical signs and symptoms, and Fisher's Exact Test (two-tailed) was
used to compare treatment outcomes of the two groups. Based on intent
ion-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in treatmen
t outcome (cure + improved) between the ampicillin/sulbactam (15/17) a
nd cefoxitin groups (16/17). Similarly, no significant differences in
bacteriologic response were noted. Both ampicillin/sulbactam and cefox
itin, when combined with appropriate surgical interventions, are safe
and effective therapies for treating foot infections in patients with
diabetes mellitus.