Pa. Borsa et al., In vivo quantification of capsular end-point in the nonimpaired glenohumeral joint using an instrumented measurement system, J ORTHOP SP, 31(8), 2001, pp. 419-426
Study Design: Single-group factorial. Objectives: Quantify glenohumeral joi
nt translations as a function of force using an instrumented measurement sy
stem. Our first specific aim was to compare the magnitude of force (N) requ
ired to reach capsular end-point between the anterior, posterior, and infer
ior directions. Our second specific aim was to compare the magnitude of tra
nslation (mm) at capsular end-point between the anterior, posterior, and in
ferior directions.
Background: Manual force-displacement techniques are subjective in nature,
and the clinician must rely on "feel" to determine capsular end-point. Seve
ral investigators have attempted to utilize more objective measures at the
glenohumeral joint, however none have quantified the force or displacements
necessary to achieve a true capsular end-point.
Methods and Measures: An arthrometric technique was used to measure anterio
r, posterior, and inferior glenohumeral translations in 20 nonimpaired shou
lders (11 women and 9 men with a mean age of 20.9 +/- 3.6 years).
Results: The magnitude of applied force required to reach capsular end-poin
t was significantly different between directions of translations. Anterior-
directed translations required a significantly greater magnitude of applied
force to reach capsular end-point than inferior-directed translations. The
magnitude of translation was not significantly different between direction
s at capsular end-point.
Conclusions: Applied forces in the range of 181 to 203 N are necessary to r
each capsular end-point in subjects with nonimpaired shoulders. Anterior tr
anslation required significantly higher forces (203.1 =/- 13.1 N) to reach
capsular end-point than inferior translation (181.4 +/- 31.9 N).