Mwh. Weenig et al., Bad news transmission as a function of the definitiveness of consequences and the relationship between communicator and recipient, J PERS SOC, 80(3), 2001, pp. 449-461
There is ample evidence suggesting (e.g,, A. Tesser & S. Rosen, 1975) that
people are reluctant to transmit bad news, Research on rumors, on the other
hand, suggests that people sometimes are less reluctant to transmit bad ne
ws. It is argued that differences between the 2 lines of research include t
he definitiveness of the consequences of the news and the relationship betw
een communicator and recipient, The influence of these 2 factors on news tr
ansmission was investigated in 3 experiments. Results showed that bad news
with indefinite consequences was transmitted more often than bad news with
definite consequences and that both kinds of bad news were transmitted more
often if the recipient was a friend rather than a stranger, Differences in
feelings of moral responsibility to transmit the news largely accounted fo
r both effects. The 2 factors did not affect the likelihood of good news tr
ansmission.