Objective This article reports on the use of focus groups and an experiment
al participatory activity to investigate factors influencing participants'
decisions about what to eat and what to report on food records and food fre
quency questionnaires.
Design Four focus groups examined participants' experience with diet record
s and 3 focus groups explored the topic of food portions using a group cons
ensus activity. Twenty-two women participated in the diet record focus grou
ps, and 15 participated in portion estimation groups.
Subjects Focus group participants were equally distributed by age and body
mass index values. Each woman completed a 10-day doubly labeled water proto
col to measure total energy expenditure, 7 days of diet records (before and
during total energy expenditure), and a food frequency questionnaire after
the total energy expenditure.
Analysis Transcripts of the focus groups were coded to index categories of
responses and to identify themes within and across those responses. Themes
discussed in this article are those that were discussed most often and at g
reatest length by all groups.
Results The diet record focus groups revealed that 2 major factors influenc
ed reporting on diet records: honesty vs social acceptability, and simplify
ing food intake. The portion estimation focus groups revealed 5 factors tha
t influenced perceptions of portion size: the role of food in the meal, the
type of food, personal preferences, product serving sizes, and comparison
of personal servings with those of others.
Applications The validity and reliability of self-reported food consumption
is greatly influenced by the ways people interpret and respond to dietary
assessment instruments. These findings indicate that dietetics professional
s need to take extra steps to address issues of accurately recording "bad"
foods when training patients to complete diet records. Extra probing is nee
ded when dietary records do not include snacks and include simple meals and
a large amount of prepared and packaged food because this may indicate tha
t changes in normal dietary patterns were made in order to more easily comp
lete a dietary record.