Assessment of no-reflow phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction with harmonic angiography and intravenous pump infusion with Levovist: Comparison with intracoronary contrast injection
L. Agati et al., Assessment of no-reflow phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction with harmonic angiography and intravenous pump infusion with Levovist: Comparison with intracoronary contrast injection, J AM S ECHO, 14(8), 2001, pp. 773-781
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Myocardial contrast echocardiography (intracoronary application) has emerge
d as an accurate method to detect the "no-reflow phenomenon." To investigat
e the diagnostic value of harmonic angiography after intravenous infusion o
f Levovist in assessing "no-reflow," both intracoronary and intravenous con
trast injections were performed in a group of patients with acute myocardia
l infarction. Seventeen consecutive patients with a successfully reperfused
acute myocardial infarction within 6 hours of symptom onset were selected
for this study. All patients underwent contrast echocardiography with harmo
nic angiography with Levovist (400 mg/mL, intravenous pump infusion, trigge
r intervals 1:4 to 1:8) and sonicated albumin (0.5 to 1 mL, intracoronary b
olus) on day 1 after the achievement of a sustained coronary reflow. Myocar
dial perfusion was qualitatively assessed with a 12-segment model. The endo
cardial length of the residual contrast defect after reflow was also calcul
ated. Forty-four of 204 segments were not analyzed after intravenous contra
st echocardiography and 37 after intracoronary contrast echocardiography be
cause of artifacts. Intracoronary and intravenous injections showed a perfu
sion defect in 31 (19%) segments, with a concordance of 89% (kappa coeffici
ent, 0.72). Concordance in anteroseptal, anterolateral, and inferolateral s
egments was 95% (kappa = 0.92), 88% (kappa = 0.66), and 83% (kappa = 0.57),
respectively. With intracoronary injection used as the reference method, i
ntravenous injection had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 93% for
diagnosing contrast defects. The endocardial extent of no-reflow was 18 +/-
19 after intravenous and 21 +/- 17 after intracoronary contrast echocardio
graphy (P = not significant). Intravenous contrast echocardiography with Le
vovist reliably identifies the no-reflow phenomenon after successful reperf
usion, especially in acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction.