Group choice refers to the distribution of group members between two choice
alternatives over time. The ideal free distribution (IFD), an optimal fora
ging model from behavioral ecology, predicts that the ratio of foragers at
two resource sites should equal the ratio of obtained resources, a predicti
on that is formally analogous to the matching law of individual choice, exc
ept that group choice is a social phenomenon. Two experiments investigated
the usefulness of IFD analyses of human group choice and individual-based e
xplanations that might account for the group-level events. Instead of nonhu
man animals foraging at two sites for resources, a group of humans chose bl
ue and red cards to receive points that could earn cash prizes. The groups
chose blue and red cards in ratios in positive relation to (lie ratios of p
oints associated with the cards. When group choice ratios and point ratios
were plotted on logarithmic coordinates and fitted with regression lines, t
he slopes (i.e., sensitivity measures) approached 1.0 but tended to fall sh
ort of it (i.e., undermatching), with little bias and little unaccounted fo
r variance. These experiments demonstrate that an IFD analysis of group cho
ice is possible and useful, and suggest that group choice may be explained
by the individual members' tendency to optimize reinforcement.