Relocation of unionid mussels into refuges (e.g., hatchery ponds) has been
suggested as a management tool to protect these animals from the threat of
zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. To evaluate the efficacy of r
elocation, we experimentally relocated 768 mussels, representing 5 species
(Leptodea fragilis, Obliquaria reflexa, Fusconaia flaw, Amblema plicata, an
d Quadrula quadrula) into an earthen pond at a National Fish Hatchery or ba
ck into the river. In both locations, mussels were placed into 1 of 4 treat
ments (mesh bags, corrals, and buried or suspended substrate-filled trays),
Mussels were examined annually for survival, growth (shell length and wet
mass), and physiological condition (glycogen concentration in foot and mant
le and tissue condition index) for 36 mo in the pond or 40 mo in the river.
We observed significant differences in mortality rates between locations (
mortality was 4 times greater in the pond than in the river), among treatme
nts (lowest mortality in the suspended trays), and among species (lower mor
tality in the amblemines than lamp-silines). Overall survival in both locat
ions averaged 80% the 1st year; survival in the pond decreased dramatically
after that. Although length and weight varied between locations and over t
ime, these changes were small, suggesting that their utility as short-term
measures of well being in long-lived unionids is questionable. Mussels relo
cated to the pond were in poor physiological condition relative to those in
the river, but the magnitude of these differences was small compared to th
e inherent variability in physiological condition of reference mussels. The
se data suggest that relocation of unionids into artificial ponds is a high
-risk conservation strategy; alternatives such as introduction of infected
host fish, identification of mussel beds at greatest risk from zebra mussel
s, and a critical, large-scale assessment of the factors contributing to th
eir decline should be explored.