Evaluation of relocation of unionid mussels into artificial ponds

Citation
Tj. Newton et al., Evaluation of relocation of unionid mussels into artificial ponds, J N AMER BE, 20(3), 2001, pp. 468-485
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
08873593 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
468 - 485
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-3593(200109)20:3<468:EOROUM>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Relocation of unionid mussels into refuges (e.g., hatchery ponds) has been suggested as a management tool to protect these animals from the threat of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. To evaluate the efficacy of r elocation, we experimentally relocated 768 mussels, representing 5 species (Leptodea fragilis, Obliquaria reflexa, Fusconaia flaw, Amblema plicata, an d Quadrula quadrula) into an earthen pond at a National Fish Hatchery or ba ck into the river. In both locations, mussels were placed into 1 of 4 treat ments (mesh bags, corrals, and buried or suspended substrate-filled trays), Mussels were examined annually for survival, growth (shell length and wet mass), and physiological condition (glycogen concentration in foot and mant le and tissue condition index) for 36 mo in the pond or 40 mo in the river. We observed significant differences in mortality rates between locations ( mortality was 4 times greater in the pond than in the river), among treatme nts (lowest mortality in the suspended trays), and among species (lower mor tality in the amblemines than lamp-silines). Overall survival in both locat ions averaged 80% the 1st year; survival in the pond decreased dramatically after that. Although length and weight varied between locations and over t ime, these changes were small, suggesting that their utility as short-term measures of well being in long-lived unionids is questionable. Mussels relo cated to the pond were in poor physiological condition relative to those in the river, but the magnitude of these differences was small compared to th e inherent variability in physiological condition of reference mussels. The se data suggest that relocation of unionids into artificial ponds is a high -risk conservation strategy; alternatives such as introduction of infected host fish, identification of mussel beds at greatest risk from zebra mussel s, and a critical, large-scale assessment of the factors contributing to th eir decline should be explored.