Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy

Citation
Pg. Borboroglu et al., Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy, J UROL, 166(3), 2001, pp. 866-870
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
166
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
866 - 870
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(200109)166:3<866:RBSIPW>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Purpose: Isolated high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and/or aty pical small acinar proliferation on prostate biopsy increases the risk of i dentifying cancer on repeat biopsy. We report the results of repeat prostat e biopsy for high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and/or atypical small acinar proliferation, and propose an optimal repeat biopsy strategy. Materials and Methods: Of 1,391 men who underwent standard systematic sexta nt biopsy of the prostate 137 (9.8%) had isolated high grade prostatic intr aepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation, including 100 who underwent repeat prostate biopsy within 12 months of the initial biops y. Results: Adenocarcinoma was detected in 47 of the 100 patients who underwen t repeat biopsy. The initial biopsy site of high grade prostatic intraepith elial neoplasia and/or atypical small acinar proliferation matched the sext ant location of cancer on repeat biopsy in 22 cases (47%). Repeat biopsy di rected only to the high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and/or at ypical small acinar proliferation site on initial biopsy would have missed 53% of cancer cases. In 12 of the 47 men (26%) cancer was limited to the si de of the prostate contralateral to the side of high grade prostatic intrae pithelial neoplasia and/or atypical small acinar proliferation. Of the 31 p atients with cancer in whom the transition zone was sampled cancer was limi ted to the transition zone in 4 (13%) and evident at other biopsy sites in 13 (42%). The only significant predictor of positive repeat biopsy was mean prostate specific antigen velocity plus or minus standard error (1.37 +/- 1.4 versus 0.52 +/- 0.8 ng./ml. per year, p <0.001). Conclusions: Patients with isolated high grade prostatic intraepithelial ne oplasia and/or atypical small acinar proliferation on prostate biopsy are a t 47% risk for cancer on repeat biopsy. The optimal repeat biopsy strategy in this setting should include bilateral biopsies of the standard sextant l ocations. We also strongly recommend that transition zone sampling should b e considered.